Introduction
In the film industry, political thrillers hold a special niche since they frequently combine suspense, intrigue, and actual geopolitics to produce gripping stories. One such movie that encapsulates the spirit of high-stakes diplomacy and provides an engrossing depiction of world politics is The Diplomat. With its outstanding performers, careful narrative, and provocative screenplay, this film is unique in its category. Does it live up to the anticipation, though? Let’s get started and examine The Diplomat in great depth.
Despite having the gallery-pleasing speech bazi element, the tone of the most recent John Abraham film, The Diplomat, is somewhat new since it attempts to break away from the overwhelming patriotic tones we are seeing these days. The tropes that come with a film that features Pakistan and its bureaucracy on the other side are present in The Diplomat, which was written by Ritesh Shah and directed by Shivam Nair. However, as I previously stated, it is not attempting to be this mythical narrative in which John Abraham is flexing his muscles on his own to do tasks. Despite all the cliched tropes, this is a decent thriller because of the inventive choice to portray it as a team effort.
Uzma Ahmed, an Indian national living in Pakistan, went to the Indian embassy there to ask for assistance since her husband, a Pakistani, was torturing her. The difficult choices that JP Singh, the chief of the embassy, had to make because the situation was so delicate are depicted in the film The Diplomat. This movie shows how Uzma got to Pakistan and how JP and his group assisted her in returning home.
You would think that John Abraham would at least hit someone at some point in the movie if you heard the title and saw that he was playing the lead. There was not a single instance in the film where the character felt like our usual hero, with the exception of a very cinematic scene in which John’s character takes over the wheels in a dire circumstance. You get the impression that the filmmakers wanted to produce a film about the bravery of a group rather than the hero because we don’t even get to see the forearms of John Abraham, who is undoubtedly the most objectified male actor in Indian cinema.
During the course of three weeks, a lot of drama is occurring in the setting of the film. In order to make the situation difficult for the Indian diplomats, Ritesh Shah is attempting to emphasize a number of things. In order to make it one obstacle after another for the hero, many things that would have been simple for the real characters are given that cinematic twist.
While some of them worked as smart maneuvers, the issue was that some of them were made smart by making the antagonists too stupid. Ritesh Shah had to ensure that the procedure wasn’t simple on a script level; therefore, occasionally he chose the ones that were super cinematic. Toward the end, John Abraham’s character, JP, the main character, tells the Indian authorities that Pakistan is only using delaying tactics, while the screenplay was the one delaying the climax.
As previously said, the film does not aim to portray John Abraham as a man with a lot of muscle; instead, it gives him a platform to be a man who responds to circumstances with poise and dignity. Since we haven’t seen that side of John in a while, the scenes in the film where he smiles subtly out of empathy had a rather different effect.
The main character’s pain was successfully depicted on television by Sadia Khateeb in her role as Uzma Ahmed. Revathy’s portrayal of the late Smt. Sushma Swaraj, the Foreign Affairs Minister at the time, felt like a milder version of the genuine person, much like her portrayal of Shylaja Teacher in Virus. Other names in the supporting cast include Sharib Hashmi and Kumud Mishra.
Also read: Crazy Movie Review Starting With Sohum Shah.
The director of the Baby spin-off, Naam Shabana, Shivam Nair, is not attempting to tell the story in a very complex way. In order to put the hero in a position where he must constantly reflect on prior horrors that occurred as part of his employment, the script chooses to use well-known clichés. The section that illustrated the torture that Uzma endured was portrayal-free of profanity. The harrowing nature of such a scenario was effectively captured by the sound design and the intense eye close-ups. The movie makes an attempt toward the conclusion to simulate the sense of urgency that one may have seen in films such as Argo, but it only partially succeeds. Cheesy conversation is used to drive the character, so the sentimental parts are louder.
Final Thoughts
All things considered, The Diplomat is an engaging film for those who value perceptive, provocative filmmaking. It solidifies its status as a notable political thriller of the modern era with its compelling plot, superb acting, and deep thematic depth.
1 thought on “The Diplomat Review -This One Attempts to Enter John’s Work Body Instead of Using It”